Archive

Latest reviews

Top 100

Top 10 per year

Directors

Contact

   
  The Color of Money

rating: (out of 4 stars)

United States; 1986
Directed by Martin Scorsese; produced by Irving Axelrad, Barbara De Fina; screenplay Richard Price
Starring Paul Newman, Tom Cruise, Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio, Helen Shaver, John Turturro, Bill Cobbs



Below you will find a temporary review for this film. The real (better, more complete) review will be online very soon.

Martin Scorsese makes great films and from time to time he makes a good one. 'The Color of Money' is one of those good ones, although it has some great aspects, and is sort of a sequel to a great film. The first film is Robert Rossen's 'The Hustler', released in 1961, with Paul Newman as Fast Eddie Felson, a great pool player but also a self-destructive man. Now, 25 years later, he (still Paul Newman) does not play the game of pool for money anymore. He is selling liquor and you can tell right away he is pretty good at it. One night his ears catch a shot made by Vincent (Tom Cruise) and right away Eddie feels that the kid could be the best. Through his girlfriend Carmen (Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio) he reaches Vincent together they hit the road to make some money playing pool.

In short this is the story. We follow Eddie, Vincent and Carmen, we learn more about the relationship between Vincent and Carmen, but also about a relationship Eddie is having with a woman named Janelle (Helen Shaver). Of course there are complications on the road, sometimes pretty clichéd, but Scorsese is one of the finest directors out there and he knows how to keep all this very entertaining. Strong performances help with that, quite a lot actually. Watching especially Newman, in every scene, is a delight and Cruise shows why he was going to be the biggest star of his generation. Shaver and Mastrantonio seem to be perfect for their roles as well.

In the end it is fair to say 'The Color of Money' does not even come close to Scorsese's best and may be not even close to 'The Hustler', but it is entertainment even when it is flawed. May be expectations are high with a Scorsese film, therefore this could feel as a disappointment. On the other hand, my guess is that this film would not have been as entertaining as it is in the hands of another director.

   
  Review by Reinier Verhoef